When looking at the politics of the American right and the American left, there is no contest for me as to which to support, if these are my only options.

I see the right doing hateful, authoritarian things that seem to violate their own principles. They violate their religious principles as a largely Christian group who say they want to emulate Jesus but then seem to do the exact opposite at every turn. WWJD seems to be about counterexamples. Non-religious principles are also violated, such as personal liberty, small government, and upholding the constitution (all of it), while trying to force their will on everyone else. Republicans are currently pushing us into a dictatorship, thwarting the balance of powers that were set up by colluding across government branches to dismantle the country, and really seeming to be going against everything our constitution is about, cackling in our face the whole time, right out in the open. Most recently this was about the white house openly declaring they wanted to be able to “deport” (sic) citizens to prisons in other countries (source: https://bsky.app/profile/onestpress.bsky.social/post/3lmd2n77ko22g). I am for personal freedom, liberty, small government, and the values of the Constitution. If Republicans stood for what they claim to, I might very well vote Republican, and do so proudly. These people just have a way of twisting these values to be about serving them only, at the cost of others losing these same things, and more.

I see the left (Democrats) trying to do a little bit of good, although they are largely pro corporation (vs the individual), and also support / do shady things militarily to other countries. It isn’t lost on me that the DMCA was signed into law by Bill Clinton which calls for search and seizure without a warrant, or that the over-response to 9/11 hasn’t been curbed at any of the possible points with democrats in power.

There is a lesser of two evils here that I see, and that is Democrats – and it isn’t even close. They aren’t perfect, but they aren’t actively, overtly, trying to do evil and destroy our country. I don’t see any realistic alternatives either.

However, there is a belief that the Democrats did everything they could do to stop Trump and all of this from happening and that other things are to blame – like perhaps not enough voters turned out, and so it’s the fault of the voters.

No matter what the reason is for the loss, for us to consider the Democrats blameless in the current state of affairs is to accept a useless medical diagnosis for the country. It essentially says that we did everything we could, we still lost, and there is no way to win. Where does that leave us other than giving up? What’s the next step besides smugly watching the world burn and saying “I told you so”? Hopelessness is a terminal diagnosis without a treatment plan.

Consider the CEO of a failing company blaming the customers for not buying the product, or the employees for not performing well enough. Even if these things are true, it’s within the CEO’s responsibility to make the company succeed as well as possible, under any circumstances. Just because a failure can be explained doesn’t excuse the responsibility of failure.

Similarly, the democratic leaders we trusted to help preserve our country have failed. They may have failed despite their best efforts, but they still failed.

Consider this: If the Republican misinformation machine of Fox News et al. can mobilize and motivate people into action, why can’t the Democrats?

I’d like to see a stronger party more about individual empowerment, tougher on corporations and their monetary influence in politics, breaking up actual monopolies, and with the energy and cunning to fight literal evil and a stronger conscience to actually do what is right.

Winning is possible, but the Democratic party opposing the Republicans is not up to the task. So the question becomes: What do we do now? I’m not sure, but I’m not giving up, and I hope you aren’t giving up, either. Let’s keep our eyes open and do what we can, even if only small acts of kindness to foster the world we want, until larger ideas come into view that we can all get behind.

If you have other ideas, speak up. We need a bit of a country wide brainstorming session right now to figure out how to attempt to fix this mess.

FYI this blog is proudly woke: Trans rights are human rights, Israel needs to stop the genocide in Palestine, Trump is everything the founding fathers of the USA were trying to protect the country against, and black lives matter.

Still here? Cool. Hello and welcome!

Imagine you sit down to board game night, pop open the box, and the dice are missing. Ack, what do you do? Don’t worry, I got you fam. We can simulate dice with coins, or coin like objects.

I want you to consider a problem: How can you simulate rolling a 6-sided dice using 3 coins? Keep that in your head as you read, and see if you can think of a way to do it before I give away the answer lower down on the page.

If you have one coin, you can flip a 2 sided dice. Tails could be 0, and Heads could be 1. (Add 1 to the numbers if you want to get a 1 or a 2).

If you have two coins, you can flip a 4 sided dice. You multiply one of the coins by 2, and add the other to it. If you know binary, these coins are just binary digits.

Coins	Binary Digits	Numbers	Result	Dice #
Tails, Tails	00	0 + 0	0	1
Tails, Heads	01	0 + 1	1	2
Heads, Tails	10	2 + 0	2	3
Heads, Heads	11	2 + 1	3	4

If you have three coins, you can flip an 8 sided dice in the same way.

Coins	Binary Digits	Numbers	Result	Dice #
Tails, Tails, Tails	000	0 + 0 + 0	0	1
Tails, Tails, Heads	001	0 + 0 + 1	1	2
Tails, Heads, Tails	010	0 + 2 + 0	2	3
Tails, Heads, Heads	011	0 + 2 + 1	3	4
Heads, Tails, Tails	100	4 + 0 + 0	4	5
Heads, Tails, Heads	101	4 + 0 + 1	5	6
Heads, Heads, Tails	110	4 + 2 + 0	6	7
Heads, Heads, Heads	111	4 + 2 + 1	7	8

This all works just fine, and each number that might come up has equal probability of coming up (it is a uniform distribution) so it gives fair rolls. But, it only works if you need dice that have a size that are power of 2. What do you do if you want to roll a 6 sided dice?

So, going back to the puzzle at the beginning: How do you simulate rolling a 6 sided dice using 3 coins?

You might think “each coin has 2 options, and there are three of them, so just add them up!”

If tails are 0 and heads are 1, the lowest number you can get is 0, and the highest number you can get is 3. You could add 1, to make it so this was a dice that gave you random numbers between 1 and 4, but it turns out to not have a uniform distribution!

Coins	Numbers	Result	Dice#
TTT	0 + 0 + 0	0	1
TTH	0 + 0 + 1	1	2
THT	0 + 1 + 0	1	2
THH	0 + 1 + 1	2	3
HTT	1 + 0 + 0	1	2
HTH	1 + 0 + 1	2	3
HHT	1 + 1 + 0	2	3
HHH	1 + 1 + 1	3	4

As you can see, there is only 1 way to get a one, and only 1 way to get a four, but there are 3 ways to get a two, and 3 ways to get a three. That means it’s 3 times as likely to get a 2 or 3, than it is to get a 1 or a 4.

So, adding up 3 coins doesn’t give us a 6 sided dice. It gives us a 4 sided dice, that doesn’t even give fair rolls. Lame!

There is a simple answer though: rejection sampling.

You flip 3 coins and that gives you a number between 1 and 8. If the number is 7 or 8, you ignore it and flip the 3 coins again.

Doing this, the numbers you KEEP (1 through 6) come up with equal probability (1/6th). The only downside is you don’t know how many times you might have to flip the coins to get a valid dice roll. That isn’t the worst thing in the world though. Sometimes when rolling dice, it falls off the table and goes under the couch or something and you have to reroll anyways. You can think of it in the same kind of way.

Advanced Tactic: When you throw out the 7 or 8, you aren’t completely empty handed. That 7 or 8 is actually 1 bit of random information you can keep. It’s essentially a uniform random coin flip, and it has no correlation with the 6 sided dice rolls, or any previous or future bit of info generated in this way. You could stash this bit away somewhere if you wanted – like write down the stream of 7s and 8s on a piece of paper, aka 0s and 1s, and then have a random bit stream for cryptographic purposes later, as a treat. Or you can use that as one of the coin flips for the reroll – flip 2 coins instead of three, and use this bit as the third coin.

So that works for a 6 sided dice, but how about a 20 sided dice?

Well, flipping 5 coins is the same as rolling a 32 sided dice and you can still use rejection sampling. If the number is between 1 and 20, keep it. If it’s bigger than 20 ignore it.

Advanced Tactic: Similarly to flipping 3 coins to either get a 6 sided dice roll, or a coin flip, the information we throw away simulating a 20 sided dice doesn’t have to be a complete waste. Interestingly, if you flip 5 coins to simulate a 20 sided dice, you throw out values between 21 and 32. If you subtract 20 from the number you throw away, you get values between 1 and 12. That’s right! Flipping 5 coins to simulate a d20 will give you a d12 when it fails that you can write down and save for later.

Flipping coins to simulate dice can also help you roll dice that would be very difficult to make in real life, such as 3 sided dice (which you can do with 2 coin flips) or 100 sided dice (which you can do with 7 coin flips).

It’s possible that each time you flip the coins, you only get heads for a very long time, and are there flipping coins for literally years, but it’s very improbable. In the context of computer programming, this “unknown and unbounded” run time is not great, but sometimes, it’s the best strategy there is. Like for instance if you can pick a random uniform point in a square, but you need a random uniform point in a star shape that was drawn by an artist, you can use rejection sampling to make it happen. (for non uniform points in arbitrary shapes, check out blue noise point sets!)

You can actually calculate how much (on average) the rejection sampling will fail though. It’s just the percentage of the values that you throw away.

• 6 Sided Dice: You use three coins to make 8 values, and throw 2 of them away (7 and 8), which means you should only have to reroll 2/8 or 1/4 of the time.
• 20 Sided Dice: You use 5 coins to make 32 values, and throw away 12 of them. So you reroll 12/32 or 3/8 of the time.
• 3 Sided Dice: You use 2 coins to make 4 values and throw away 1 of them. So you reroll 1/4 of the time.
• 100 Sided Dice: You roll 7 coins to make 128 values and you throw away 28 of them. So you reroll 28/128 or 7/32 of the time.

When you keep the randomness generated from your rejections, you don’t lose anything really, but these formulas should help you understand how much random information is being generated in each stream over time, which in a computerized system could cause latency or thread starvation type scenarios.

One final thing – what do you do if you only have unfair coins (or coin like objects) that don’t have equal odds for coming up heads vs tails? Well, we take a hint from John Von Neumann and flip two coins (or one twice). If they mismatch, you use the first coin as the coin flip, else you ignore it and flip twice again. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_coin#Fair_results_from_a_biased_coin